alt.building.construction

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:36:26 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:

>> Don Homuth < > wrote in
>> news:vi9te3p4b3qorhbjscsl9it28b3ff4hl9a@ :
>>

>>> How do you extract money from folks who don't seem to have any?
>
>Oddly, they seem to have money for so many other frivolous things.

Their decision -- not yours. The Gubmint no longer decides for
individuals what is frivolous and what is not.

>So, your solution is that the taxpayer (at gun point) should subsidize them.

The idea of public law enforcement is that it protects Most from Some.
I have no problem with paying what that costs.

(And you are not Forced to do anything at gunpoint regardless.)

>And you talk about loony "Libertoons"?

No -- I just talk about Libertoonians generally. Some are more Loony
than others, clearly -- mostly those who take their discussions all
that seriously and claim that they argue on Principle.

No -- they argue merely on Personal Preference.

> BTW, the libertarians, more
>appropriately called "free market/classical liberal",

The terms no longer have any specific denotative meaning, save for
ranting purposes. Nor do You solely decide what something is
appropriately called.

>... (so your idiotic ad
>hominum can be seen for what it's (not) worth), were the founders of our
>country (insert anticipated typical BS about them being slave holders).

Well, no -- they really weren't, given what was going on at the time.

And yes -- a bunch of them Were slave holders, and viewed other People
as Property at the time.

>Shall we give a demonstration about Homuth's "progressive" tripe?

This is the amUsenet -- a strong bastion of Free Speech, and the Right
thereof.

That notwithstanding, there is no obligation thereby to take you
seriously.